John E. Wanebo, MD*
Joseph M. Zabramski, MD
Giuseppe Lanzino, MD**
Shahram Partovi, MD+
Robert F. Spetzler, MD
Divisions of Neurological Surgery and
+Neuroradiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's
Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
**Department of Neurosurgery, University of
Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, Illinois
Current Address:
*Naval Medical Center, San Diego,
California
This study compared the use of PET and CT perfusion imaging before
and after cerebral revascularization. PET and CT perfusion images
were obtained in a patient with unilateral carotid occlusion before
and after STA-MCA bypass was performed. Improved cerebral
blood flood and reduced mean transit times were noted on the side
of the STA-MCA bypass. These results correlated with the PET and CT
perfusion images. This case demonstrates the possibility of using
CT perfusion to assess cerebral blood flow pre- and postoperatively
in patients undergoing cerebral revascularization for carotid
occlusion.
Key
Words: cerebral blood flow, computed tomography perfusion,
positron emission tomography, revascularization
Abbreviations
Used: ACA, anterior cerebral artery; CBF, cerebral blood
flow; COSS, Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study; CT, computed
tomography; EC-IC, extracranial-intracranial; ICA, internal carotid
artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MR, magnetic resonance; PET,
positron emission tomography; STA, superficial temporal artery
Evaluating the need for and success of revascularization is
evolving.[6] PET, single photon emission CT, and xenon CT have been
standard techniques used to assess cerebral hemodynamics and stroke
risk.[6,8,10,13,18-20,22,23,25,26] However, these imaging
techniques are unavailable at most centers. Advances in CT scanners
and software have facilitated the development of CT perfusion
techniques, which provide a CBF study using a standard spiral CT
scanner.[14]
Qualitative brain perfusion imaging is based
on two methods: the diffusible tracer model such as in PET or the
tracer kinetic model such as in CT perfusion. Until recently,
the only quantitative method for assessing cerebral perfusion has
been PET, which has served as the gold standard in this
field. Validation models have shown that techniques such as
CT perfusion may also help to assess brain perfusion
quantitatively.[21] CT perfusion is a relatively new modality
that permits the microcirculation of the brain to be evaluated
without the need for expensive radiotracers or intra-arterial
access as needed in PET. It is performed on standard spiral (or
better) CT scanners using an intravenous bolus injection of
iodinated contrast followed by dynamic scanning.
We describe a patient who underwent cerebral
revascularization after a MCA stroke caused by unilateral carotid
occlusion who was evaluated by both PET and CT perfusion scanning
before and after surgery. The information about CBF provided by CT
perfusion was comparable to that obtained with PET. CT perfusion
imaging may be an alternate modality for evaluating compromised
CBF.
Figure 1. (A) Axial T2-weighted MR image of the brain shows
encephalomacia in the distribution of the right MCA
consistent
with chronic infarction. (B) Axial diffusion-weighted MR
image
at the same level shows no hyperintense signal that would
suggest an acute infarction.
|
Illustrative
Case
A 66-year-old, right-handed, white man had sustained a
cardioembolic stroke in the right MCA 15 months before his
admission following a myocardial infarction a month earlier.
Initially, the patient was hemiplegic on the left side and had
partial left homonymous hemianopsia. He had improved to the
point of ambulation with a cane. His medical history was
significant for hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and a seizure
disorder.
Physical examination revealed a thin male in
no apparent distress. His general physical examination was
unremarkable. He was alert and oriented times three with clear,
fluent speech. His cranial nerves were intact except for trace
central left facial palsy, and his tongue protruded to the left. He
had left temporal quadrantanopsia. On motor examination his
strength was 4/5 on the left. His deep tendon reflexes were 3+ on
the left side and 2+ on the right. He had a positive Babinski sign
on plantar stimulation of the left foot.
He underwent CT perfusion imaging. To
obtain CT perfusion images, dynamic scanning was performed at a
slice location where the territories of the ACA, MCA, and posterior
cerebral artery could be identified. This level typically includes
the basal ganglia. During a bolus intravenous injection of
iodinated contrast (40 ml), axial images were rapidly obtained at
the same slice location. With mulitdetector technology, more than
one slice location was imaged even though the scanner table is
stationary. The resultant images were postprocessed on a
workstation to yield CT perfusion images. The entire process
typically required less than 15 minutes. The PET studies were
performed with an oxygen tracer [15O]. Scan times were 1
minute.
Preoperative MR imaging of the brain showed a
chronic infarct in the distribution of the right MCA (Fig.
1). MR angiography of the neck and brain suggested complete
occlusion of the right ICA. Preoperative digital subtraction
angiography confirmed the right ICA occlusion and further
delineated filling of the right ACA from the left via the anterior
communicating artery (Fig. 2). Trace retrograde filling of the
right MCA via collaterals from the right ophthalmic artery was also
noted.
Discussion
After its introduction for clinical use in the late 1960s, EC-IC
bypass was commonly applied to patients with carotid occlusion in
an attempt to prevent subsequent stroke.[3,24] However, a
multicenter randomized trial of surgery compared to medical
management failed to demonstrate that STA-MCA bypass surgery
prevented stroke.[17] The EC-IC bypass trial was criticized for
failure to evaluate the subgroup of patients with reduced cerebral
perfusion whom might have benefited from cerebral
revascularization.[2,16,26]
The St. Louis Carotid Occlusion Study
identified a subgroup of symptomatic patients with carotid
occlusion who had impaired cerebral perfusion as measured by
increased oxygen-extraction fraction (stage 2 hemodynamic failure)
on PET.[6] A new EC-IC bypass study
(Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study, COSS) has
been funded by the National Institutes of Health and is presently
enrolling patients at 30 centers across the United States. Should
revascularization prove effective in preventing stroke in this
population, evaluation of CBF will become routine for patients with
carotid occlusion. Because the 15O isotope used for PET imaging of
CBF and measurement of oxygen-extraction fraction has a half-life
of only 2 minutes, it requires on-site production and is available
at only a limited number of centers. CT perfusion may offer a
more readily available method of evaluating cerebral
hemodynamics.
In this case report, CBF was evaluated with
PET using water labeled with 15O and compared to CBF as measured by
CT perfusion. However, CT perfusion imaging was not compared to the
oxygen extraction fraction. The latter was the gold standard for
evaluating type 2 hemodynamic failure in the St. Louis Carotid
Occlusion Study. Whether the changes in blood flow seen with CT
perfusion would correlate with changes in the oxygen extraction
fraction with PET remains to be tested.
This is a report of the utility of CT
perfusion in its current state as a tool to assess CBF after
STA-MCA bypass grafting in a patient with symptomatic carotid
occlusion. Studies with PET have shown postoperative improvement of
cerebral hemodynamics after STAMCA bypass.[1,4,5,9,11,12,15] This
case demonstrates the possibility of using CT perfusion to assess
CBF before and after surgery in patients undergoing
revascularization for carotid occlusion. In this case the patient
improved clinically after bypass, nicely correlating with the
improved blood flow seen on his CT perfusion images.
Further study of PET and CT perfusion imaging
in a prospective, controlled fashion to determine the true
comparability of the two modalities for analysis of CBF is
necessary. Although not performed in the patient reported here, the
effect of an acetazolamide challenge on CBF can be measured with CT
perfusion imaging and may be an appropriate comparison with PET
studies evaluating the oxygen extraction fraction. Carotid
occlusion patients may provide a substrate for assessing the
utility of CT perfusion imaging in comparison with other modalities
such as PET. CT perfusion also may be used to evaluate CBF in other
candidates for revascularization, such as those with moyamoya
disease or those with complex aneurysms or tumors who undergo
balloon test occlusion to evaluate the feasibility of vessel
sacrifice. CT perfusion may be a test more readily implemented in
hospitals than xenon CT or PET using existing CT scanners with the
appropriate software.